Art Law Report Header-1

Expert Opinion Casts Doubt on Gurlitt’s Testamentary Capacity to Make the Will that Names the Kunstmuseum Bern as Heir

Posted by Nicholas O'Donnell on November 17, 2014 at 11:42 AM

While we have tried to read the tea leaves and predict what the Kunstmuseum Bern will do on or before November 26 (the deadline to accept or reject the appointment as Cornelius Gurlitt’s heir)—and what others might do if the museum turns it down, less prominent has been the validity of the will in question itself. It is far from a forgone conclusion, however, that his last-minute will would hold up under scrutiny. The circumstances alone—an elderly person, under enormous international scrutiny, placed under a guardianship—beg the question.

After recent ruminations on the other heirs’ intentions, the Süddeutsche Zeitung reported on an expert opinion written by psychiatrist Helmut Hausner. According to the SZ, Hausner highlighted several concerns:

  • Gurlitt was suffering from “paranoid delusions”
  • His “decision making process” had been “distorted” by the delusions, which existed as a "separate disease" since the 1960s
  • Hausner cited letters in which Gurlitt had expressed concern “for decades” of being persecuted by the Nazis.
  • He feared a plot to take away the pictures he inherited from his father Hildebrand.

In Hausner’s estimation, Gurlitt named the museum as his heir to escape the Nazis in Germany that he believed were pursuing him.

Given all this on the one hand, and the actual situation in Germany on the other (i.e., that Nazi Germany ended almost 70 years ago), one can wonder if he was indeed fit to make such a bequest. It would be stunning if the museum’s decision ultimately did not matter, but no less surprising than so many other developments in this case.

Topics: Schwabinger Kunstfund, Hildebrand Gurlitt, Cornelius Gurlitt, Nazi-looted art, Gurlitt Collection, Restitution, testamentary capacity, World War II, Kunstmuseum Bern, Münchner Kunstfund

Sullivan logo

About the Blog


The Art Law Report provides timely updates and commentary on legal issues in the museum and visual arts communities. It is authored by Nicholas M. O'Donnell, partner in our Art & Museum Law Practice.

The material on this site is for general information only and is not legal advice. No liability is accepted for any loss or damage which may result from reliance on it. Always consult a qualified lawyer about a specific legal problem.

Meet the Editor

Subscribe to Blog

Recent Posts

Posts by Topic

see all